Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Sunday, May 28, 2006
Over Carmichael's article the newspaper ran a large photo of a rainbow umbrella. (See the screenshot, above). That was code, of course, for Y'all come, now!
Historically, it's been rare to see overt mention of gay and lesbian visitors by local tourism promoters. Even the media commonly spoke only in code about "crowds" and "out of town tourists" and organized "beach parties." At most, they might run a photograph or two showing a rainbow flag, kite, or umbrella.
As long as the money flowed easily no one on Pensacola Beach was particularly interested in aggressively promoting the gay and lesbian tourist trade. The attitude of even socially enlightened business owners seemed to be 'We have their business already; why spend money to promote it?"
Today, reporter Angela Fail follows up Carmichael's piece by noting that this year the crowds haven't materialized. "Get the picture?" she asks coyly.
The picture she wants us to get, no doubt, is the accompanying photograph of a small clutch of beach umbrellas at Casino Beach. (See second screen-shot, above) Only one shows the distinctive rainbow colors featured so prominently just a day earlier.
Saturday, beach businesses were eager to welcome tens of thousands of gay and lesbian tourists, but as in past years neither they nor the Santa Rosa Island Authority did anything to explicitly invite them. Now that the hoped-for crowds haven't appeared, beach businesses are scrambling to re-code the weekend into a locals-only thing. Capt'n Fun club owner Tom Carmichael wants to say, "The misconception is huge."
What 'misconception'? Well, it's nowhere explicit -- but locals will get the point. They're the only ones left who can save this weekend for beach businesses. Y'all come, now!
There's little doubt that residual hurricane damage and the still-closed Opal Beach facility of the U.S. Park Service have put off the usual crowds of gay and lesbian visitors. But it would be a mistake for beach businesses to revert permanently to the bad old days of failing to acknowledge and welcome them.
Three years ago the old pbrla.com web site noted that the "Gay Memorial Day Weekend" on Pensacola Beach traditionally has been the most lucrative weekend of the summer season.
"Hotel and restaurant workers often say that tips over Memorial Day Weekend exceed anything they see the rest of the summer. Beach rentals almost always are full. Hotels can be completely booked many months in advance. It's the one time of year when locals actually consider whether they should telephone ahead for a dinner reservation."The article also made extensive mention of Univ. of West Florida Prof. Steven Philipp's 1999 economic study of Pensacola Beach Memorial Day titled, "Gay and Lesbian Tourists at a Southern U.S.A. Beach Event." That lengthy study, originally published by Haworth Press, involved 1,200 interviews with "gay and lesbian" visitors to Pensacola Beach over one Memorial Day weekend, plus a historical analysis going back to the 1920's about the "Gay Memorial Day Weekend" for which Pensacola Beach had become famous.
As noted at the time, Prof. Philipp's study demonstrated that gay and lesbian tourists show a "strong preference... for traveling to communities that openly welcome them and even sponsor gay-friendly events for them, as Disney World had just begun to do in the early '90s."
Another of the study's findings was that gay and lesbian visitors take "a keen interest... in local newspaper and television coverage" and "even isolated incidents of anti-gay bias can blow-back and cause severe economic adversity for an entire community."
Prof. Philipp's lengthy study offered some cause for concern for beach commerce:
"The time may be fast disappearing when Pensacola Beach businesses can take the Memorial Day Weekend trade of gays and lesbians for granted. The more welcome we make these visitors feel, the more likely they are to continue coming."The Island Authority and beach chamber of commerce have never really done much to encourage the gay tourist trade. They shouldn't be surprised that it has disappeared in the wake of two devastating hurricanes.
"Tourist destinations which have enjoyed substantial gay patronage in the past, without making much effort on their own to attract or sustain it, increasingly may find themselves faced with aggressive competition from other vacation destinations. Not only do gay visitors expect tolerance from their host communities, as anyone would, but more and more they prefer destinations that are willing to openly and avowedly welcome them.
"Such communities offer what Prof. Philipp describes as "tourism incentives and promotion... special attractions .... welcoming receptions by public figures, [and] positive media coverage... ."
Yes, this weekend locals could do beach businesses a big favor by coming out Sunday to enjoy the surf and sand. But over the next year those who promote island tourism could do themselves and beach businesses a bigger favor by finding creative ways to openly and "avowedly welcome" back gay and lesbian tourists. And they might start by turning to local gay and lesbian leaders for help in identifying how to go about it.
Monday, May 29
"When 63 percent of young people can't find Iraq on a map after three years of war and coverage, you know that the institutions that claim to be informing us are doing everything but."Danny Schechter of Media Channel.org has published a short and sweet call to exercise your memory on Memorial Day.
Saturday, May 27, 2006
Friday, May 26, 2006
"Tourists are very fickle beasts, even the perception that a destination is risky will lead to a marked decrease in tourist traffic."The world isn't flat. It's of varying size, depending on what you're looking for.-- Howard Rosenzweig 2003, quoted in Worldmapper.com
At least, that's the perspective of cartographers at World Mapper who are in the middle of preparing a collection of world maps with land masses re-sized to reflect statistical realities.
"The maps presented on this website are cartograms, otherwise known as density-equalising maps. The maps of the world you are used to seeing attempt to represent countries according to their land area. A cartogram re-sizes each country (or other geographical unit) according to some other variable - for example population, GDP, number of people with AIDS, etc. In the population example, densely-populated country such as the UK will appear much larger than it does on a standard map, and sparsely populated countries will appear smaller."To date, they've completed a little fewer than a hundred world maps covering such subjects as immigration, petroleum exports, new patent activity, railroad passenger usage, etc. etc.
Still to come later this year, they say, our favorite category:
- Persons Killed
- Mud Slides
- Extreme Temperatures
Thursday, May 25, 2006
While shopping for hurricane supplies at Ace Hardware, Winn-Dixie, and Lowe's yesterday, we chatted with a number of adult customers and, to while away the time while waiting in line, we conducted an informal poll. Here are the results:
Number of residents who could name both finalists for American Idol: 5 out of 5
Number of residents who could name one of the two Florida U.S. senators: 0 out of 5
Number of residents polled who blamed the media for their ignorance: 5 out 5
Wednesday, May 24, 2006
"An Inconvenient Truth, based on a slide show Gore developed and has given for years, is part documentary, part dark comedy and part horror thriller."-- USA Today
---"The temptation to reject the truth and try to manufacture your own reality is what got us into Iraq—it’s what got us into these deficits. At some point, reality has its day."
It isn't happening here in Pensacola. Not yet, anyway.-- Al Gore, Newsweek, Apr. 28, 2006
But the David Guggenheim documentary An Inconvenient Truth, opens today in major cities across the nation. Here are some comments among the multitude who have seen the film in previews and at Cannes this past week:
Andrew O'Hehir in Salon, Tuesday, May 23: "'An Inconvenient Truth,' the striking and surprisingly endearing film about Gore's global-warming crusade made by director Davis Guggenheim, in a day or two."
A. O. Scott, New York Times movie review:
"[T]he movie is not about [Al Gore]. He is, rather, the surprisingly engaging vehicle for some very disturbing information. His explanations of complex environmental phenomena — the jet stream has always been a particularly tough one for me to grasp — are clear, and while some of the visual aids are a little corny, most of the images are stark, illuminating and powerful.Margaret Carlson of Bloomberg News Service:
"I can't think of another movie in which the display of a graph elicited gasps of horror, but when the red lines showing the increasing rates of carbon-dioxide emissions and the corresponding rise in temperatures come on screen, the effect is jolting and chilling. Photographs of receding ice fields and glaciers — consequences of climate change that have already taken place — are as disturbing as speculative maps of submerged coastlines. The news of increased hurricane activity and warming oceans is all the more alarming for being delivered in Mr. Gore's matter-of-fact, scholarly tone."
"[M]uch of what Gore said in his 1993 book, 'Earth in the Balance,' has proven prophetic. His prescriptions -- increased mileage standards, wind power, appliances rated by the energy efficiency, hybrid cars -- are more practical than anything the government has done lately and are now widely accepted, even by the industries that fought them.
* * *
"Translated to film, 'An Inconvenient Truth'' -- part slide show, part home movie, part freshmen lecture hall -- is never going to be confused with 'The DaVinci Code' with which it shared billing at the 59th Cannes Film Festival this weekend. But it is important, if not always entertaining. It doesn't have the polemics or histrionics of Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 911.'' It's NPR, not 'CSI Miami.'
* * *
"It's short and pithy, what Gore's speeches often weren't. The visuals are simple. He drives home the point that there's no factual dispute over global warning. A Science magazine survey of all peer-reviewed studies on climate change showed that of the 928 independent studies done to date, (those not paid for by industry) all concluded that global warming is a real and growing threat.
"There are no independent studies saying otherwise. Yet stories sampled from newspapers, television and magazines, show that 53 percent suggest global warming is unproven.
"In that way, global warming is much like the evidence that tobacco caused lung cancer. For decades it was greeted by the industry, politicians, doctors paid to do ads and the media with unwarranted skepticism -- until everyone accepted that smoking makes you deathly ill.
* * *
"The movie comes at a time when some pundits (including me) might wonder if we should give a rest to that old saw about likeability. Maybe Americans prefer to have a beer and burger with the charming frat boy to the student who always does his homework. But is that a wise basis for choosing a president?
"With all the needless death from a ill-conceived war, the wasteful corruption of sweetheart contracts in Iraq and New Orleans, debt and deficits as far as the eye can see, gas prices through the roof with no energy policy in sight, and with a president who delegates to incompetents and cronies, I'm ready to give the class nerd his due and raise a glass to a serious man. Here's to you, Al and a huge box-office gross."
Post-Ivan Civic Recovery
The Alliance for Climate Protection
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
In April the Colorado State people formerly under Dr. William Gray predicted 17 named storms and 9 hurricanes for 2006. In May, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration followed by predicting "13 to 16 named storms" and eight to 10" hurricanes.
Now the chief meteorologist for AccuWeather, Joe Bastardi (has there ever been a more suitable name for a hurricane forecaster?) claims he's seeing "indications that the Northeast will experience a hurricane larger and more powerful than anything that region has seen in a long time," possibly as soon as this summer.
Apparently, his team's prediction is grounded in perceived "weather cycles that indicate which U.S. coastal areas are most susceptible to landfalls."
"The Northeast is staring down the barrel of a gun," said Joe Bastardi, Chief Forecaster of the AccuWeather.com Hurricane Center. "The Northeast coast is long overdue for a powerful hurricane, and with the weather patterns and hydrology we're seeing in the oceans, the likelihood of a major hurricane making landfall in the Northeast is not a question of if but when."Others disagree. As USA Today observed last week, "Most forecasters put the odds of a major northeastern hurricane somewhat lower than Bastardi, but still well worth considering. There is a 7% chance of a hurricane making landfall somewhere between New York City and the southern suburbs of Boston this year, according to meteorologists at Colorado State University."
Modestly good news also comes from the Pacific, where scientists see La Niña not becoming a factor this year. In contrast to the past two years, "[T]he equatorial Pacific will be neutral to warm in August, when it really matters for hurricanes."
Locally, we've noticed there is considerable confusion over the La Niña issue. Some misinterpret the latest news from the Pacific to mean hurricane activity will diminish this year. Nothing could be further from fact.
Perhaps the clearest explanation is to be found at Spacemart.com, which quotes Goddard Space Flight Center's La Niña expert, David Adamec, as saying, "The current [Pacific Ocean] temperature signal at the end of April is near normal and the ocean surface temperature has not yet caused the atmosphere to respond in a La Niña-like way."
This means at best La Niña will be a neutral factor. Still, as the Boston Globe reports:
"The North Atlantic is in the midst of a 'multi-decadal signal,' a climate pattern favorable to hurricane formation and which is likely to last another 10 or 20 years, said Max Mayfield, hurricane center chief.Water temperatures in the North Atlantic are said to be nearly twice as warm as normal for this time of year. According to the Danbury New Times, "A buoy 200 miles off the New Jersey coast recorded a water temperature of 70 degrees in mid-April. It's typically 42 degrees at that time."
That climate pattern involves a confluence of conditions in the ocean and atmosphere, with warmer sea surface temperatures fueling storms and weaker than usual wind shear allowing them to gather force rather than get broken up as they travel westward, said Gerry Bell, hurricane outlook lead meteorologist."
This has some pushing the panic button. "Something of a perfect storm is developing," says the New Times. As far north as Nova Scotia, residents are taking hurricane preparedness seriously.
The truth is no one can predict so far ahead whether, where, or when any particular Atlantic Ocean basin storm will make landfall. All the predictions we've seen so far are based strictly on statistical probabilities from complex data. But individual storms don't necessarily follow the statistical mean. As Florida's own experience in 2004-05 shows, wild variations -- for good or ill -- can occur in any year within a broader 'multi-decadel' cycle, or for that matter, within a multi-century global warming pattern.
All we can do is prepare for the mean and hope for better.
Speaking of water temperatures, the coastal waters off Pensacola are right around the average for this time of year, as you can see on this NOAA weather chart.
Fun-loving reporters ought to start an office pool to see who can grab the goofiest Memorial Day Weekend quote. It's still early, but this year Dereck Pivnick already may have the prize in the bag. In today's paper he quotes Island Authority general manager Buck Lee as saying, "All of our parking lots are striped, asphalted and open."
Now, that's just the kind of good news fun-loving tourists were waiting to hear, right?
Sunday, May 21, 2006
The amendment passed. The full bill is still pending. Complete text of the bill, cost estimates, and other information is here.
If new citizens will have to pass a test about these "key documents" you may be wondering how someone else -- someone, perhaps like you -- would do.
Click here to take a fairly elementary ten-question test. If you don't get all of the questions right, you should consider dropping a note to some foreign embassy and asking for an immigration visa. Apparently, you're too stupid to be here, in Mr. Sessions' opinion.
If you manage to answer all the questions correctly, try the 13-question test right here. It really isn't all that much harder, but we very much doubt Mr. Sessions himself could pass it. He's one who assumes the president is free to spy on all Americans within the U.S. without a court-ordered warrant issued upon probable cause.
The Fourth Amendment says differently.
Saturday, May 20, 2006
"How many fish will become contaminated, and how high become the chances of getting cancer if you eat them, essentially remain unanswered questions."Back when there was an official Pensacola Beach Residents web site and Linda Leithner was writing a column called Island Insights, she had occasion to observe:
"Most economic impact studies are like the annual Oscar Awards ceremony, only with leather patches on the elbows to resemble serious research. They tend to be fatuous exercises in self-congratulation based on questionable assumptions that reaffirm a pre-existing bias. Nevermore so, it seems, than when the study is funded by the very entity in question."We were reminded of this over the past week as we encountered time and again in the pages of the Pensacola News Journal references to an "economic impact study" that proved sinking the U.S.S. Oriskany would mean a boost of "millions of dollars a year" for the Pensacola area economy.
- Last Sunday, PNJ reporter Polyana de Costa lived up to her delightfully sunny name by quoting Pensacola tourism director Ed Schroeder as saying, "Pensacola will become an international diving attraction." He specifically referred to "a 1998 study by Florida State University and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration" for empirical support.
- On Tuesday, PNJ reporter Larry Wheeler dropped the FSU connection altogether and claimed the report was authored "recently" by the NOAA: "The Oriskany is expected to boost the local economy as it attracts sport fishing charters and recreational divers. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently estimated an extra $11.3 million a year for the local area."
- Wednesday, Wheeler again referenced the same number but without the misidentified authorship when he wrote, "Once on the bottom, the Oriskany will become an artificial reef. It is expected to attract divers and sports fishermen who could generate as much as $11.3 million a year in additional economic activity for the Pensacola Bay Area."
- By Thursday, PNJ news reporter Eric Drew was sticking his own calculator in treacherous waters by quoting another local tourism promoter who plainly relied on the same economic study to say, "We're anticipating millions of dollars in economic impact."
The "economic impact" study everybody was applauding is a 500+ page tome produced by two professors at FSU, a NOAA economist, and "five Florida State University College of Business students majoring in Hospitality Administration." The prime contractor was the State of Florida's "Office of Fisheries Management and Assistance Service."
Do you suppose that state bureaucrats in an agency with a name like "Fisheries Management and Assistance Service" have a stake in proving that "assisting" "fish management" through a "service" like artificial reefs is beneficial for the public?
The title of the economic impact study is, "The Economic Impact and Economic Value of the Recreational Use of Artificial Reefs in a Five-County Area of Northwest Florida." The complete study, for those of you who need a sleeping aid, can be found here.
Much of it is repetitive from one county (and chapter) to the next. Chapter 5, pertaining to Escambia County, starts at page 391 (in pdf format). Sure snoozers can be found on nearly every page, along with countless grammatical errors and writing so leaky the thing barely floats:
- "This techniques is [sic] not based upon the willingness to pay question posed above."
- "What is this value? It is the interpreted [sic] as the incremental recreational value afforded to the average fisher by artificial reefs as a recreational aid on a fishing day."
- "We shall discuss this further after we gave reviewed [sic] the two other procedures used to estimate the WTP as discussed above."
Even taking everything the study has to say as gospel, there are reasons to wonder just how much the ex-Oriskany reef really can boost the local economy. Everyone's had great fun watching the thing happen, and we are certainly among them. No doubt a few additional divers will visit Pensacola every year for the thrill of seeing it rust away up close; and the charter boats have a new destination to visit. But are these modest advantages enough to say the Pensacola area can expect "millions" in additional tourist revenue every year?
One of the study's key findings is that by far the largest impact will come from recreational fishermen, not divers. It found, moreover, that such "users would like the reefs deployed some distance from shore to maximize fishing success, but placed in no more than 150 feet of water." [emphasis added]
As it happens, the Oriskany is now "sitting pretty," to use Troy Moon's words in Friday's News Journal, some 217-233 feet beneath the surface. That's considerably deeper than 150 feet.
Another finding explodes the common wisdom "that artificial reefs increase the overall abundance of fish." It turns out this has no basis in fact, according to the economic impact study everybody loves to cite. With admirable candor, the study's authors state flatly, "[N]o scientific study is known to the authors that definitely establishes that the fish population is actually increased with artificial reefs."
Fish newly attracted to the Ex-Oriskany reef were living somewhere to begin with. Apparently, science has no reason to think that in their new home they will procreate any faster or more successfully.
Nor is it clear that the reef will improve the quality of life for fishes -- or the humans who consume them. It turns out that along with the Oriskany the U.S. Navy also sunk an estimated 700 pounds or more of cancer-causing PCB's, most of it shielding communications cables. As the environmental advocacy group Basel Action Network pointed out in formal objections to the Oriskany plan filed in January, the EPA has said repeatedly there is no "safe" level of PCB contamination.
Another study -- this one, a 'modeling' study into the environmental and health hazards posed as the Oriskany's PCB's leach into Gulf waters -- was nearly as worthless as any "economic impact" study you'll find. Since a Navy ship the size of the Oriskany has never before been scuttled to make an artificial reef, there's no real-world data to rely upon in predicting whether and to what extent the PCB's will increase the cancer rate in Pensacola or elsewhere in the Gulf of Mexico. Consequently, the Navy invented a computer "model" to simulate it.
How many fish will become contaminated, and how high become the chances of getting cancer if you eat them, essentially remain unanswered questions. As the final report acknowledges, in the computer study --
"The major sources of uncertainty were the assumptions and parameters used in the models, the applicability and sensitivity of the benchmarks used in the assessment, and uncertainty about the sources of PCBs on the vessel."That pretty well covers the waterfront, you might say. It all boils down to one big shrug and a "Who knows?"
All of these studies and projections and modelings remind us of another story. It's been said that the great American humorist Robert Benchley, when he was an undergraduate at Harvard, awoke late one morning to realize that he had a final exam that day in some obscure subject like International Relations. It was the classic undergraduate's nightmare: he had forgotten to attend class all year long, he didn't know a thing about the subject, and he'd never seen the texbook.
Nevertheless, Benchley raced to the classroom and arrived just in time. His heart sank as he read the test. It was a two-hour exam with one essay question: "Describe, analyze, and discuss the Russo-Swedish Fishing Rights Treaty of 1790 from the viewpoint of the Russians or the Swedes."
Knowing nothing whatsoever about the matter, Benchley began by writing, "I propose to describe, analyze, and discuss the Russo-Swedish Fishing Rights Treaty of 1790 from the viewpoint of the fish." And then he did so.
Benchley passed the course.
This should inspire the Pensacola Chamber of Commerce. One "economic impact" that surely can be netted from the Oriskany reef is some kind of huge, multi-generational federal grant to study the economic impact of artificial reefs from the viewpoint of the fish.
Friday, May 19, 2006
Someone needs to check the boots of Gannett Corp.'s notorious newspaper assassin, Kevin Doyle, to see if there are any fibers matching the rump of Randy's pants.
One item we really don't get: "Tiki torches" will be tax free for the duration.
What's a tiki torch? Island Madness offers a definition:
"Tiki torches are decorative poles about 5 feet ... in height with a top fuel reservoir and wick. They can be placed along walkways, patios, pools or gardens to provide a wonderful tropical ambiance."How helpful will a flickering flame be in the middle of a "wonderful tropical ambiance" like a hurricane-force wind? Can anyone...um... er... shed any light on this subject?
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Well, judging from the latest issue of Nature, he wasn't a Neanderthal. But he might have been a chimpanzee.
This is going to drive certain religious folk who are stuck in the 14th century absolutely nuts. Scientists around the world are using new and inventive DNA sequencing techniques to extract lineage information from long-dead skulls and other bones which they can then compare with live animals like us. One result appears to be the discovery that our distant human relatives interbred with a lot of chimpanzees.
Or, as Michael Hopkins puts it more delicately in the latest news from Nature magazine [subscription required]:
The evolutionary split between humans and our nearest evolutionary cousins, chimpanzees, may have occurred more recently than we thought, according to a new comparison of the respective genetic sequences. What's more, it might have been a messy divorce rather than a clean break — leading to the controversial theory that our two sets of ancestors may have interbred many thousands of years after first parting company.One consequence of the findings is that new doubt has been cast on the exact nature of the Toumai skull, found five years ago. It's been asserted by some that Toumai was the earliest hominid remains yet found, while others claimed it looked more like a chimpanzee. Without more bones, no one could be sure.
* * *
[R]esearchers led by David Reich of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, now calculate that the split [between Humans and Chimpanzees] may have occurred no more than 6.3 million years ago, and possibly as recently as 5.4 million.
The latest DNA sequencing, however, leaves Toumai out of the bipedal human category altogether. But that doesn't mean she wasn't your grandmother.
Even after diverging from chimps, it now appears that humans and chimpanzees continued to have a... shall we say, intimate relationship.
Another Nature article this week, this one by Rex Dalton, reports on DNA sequencing being done at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. He reports that a new technique for extracting genetic fragments from ancient bones suggests the "Neanderthal Y chromosome is substantially more different from human and chimp Y chromosomes than are other chromosomes."
This would mean that humans engaged in "little interbreeding... at least among the more recent Neanderthal species."
Some will put two and two together and see this as great news. Homo Sapiens had little or nothing to do with the brutish-looking Neanderthals. But others will see it as bad news: Our human ancestors preferred the affections of chimpanzees.
We suspect both views are far too anthromomorphic. Isn't it just as likely that it was the Neanderthals who wouldn't have anything to do with us, rather than the other way 'round?
This makes perfect sense to us. Especially if the Neanderthals caught us cavorting with chimpanzees.
Luckily for those of us who are around today, the chimps were less persnickety about who they slept with.
The Navy has released a series of photos showing the sinking of the Oriskany yesterday off the Pensacola Beach coast. Check out the official NAS Pensacola press release by Megan Kohr. Follow the links on the right-hand side of your screen to see the photos or download high resolution copies.
A fellow by the name of Adam was an eyewitness to yesterday's sinking of the Oriskany. He says, "That was one of the coolest things I will ever see in my life."
Well, he's young.
Apparently, everyone has a novel bursting to get out, except for the faculty and students at PJC.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Carol J. Williams of the Los Angeles Times has details about how the sinking will be carefully controlled:
To minimize the risk of storms or tidal action affecting its position, it will be aligned north to south, bow out and stern to the distant shoreline.It's been a long, strange trip for the distinguished Essex Class aircraft carrier. None was stranger than the on-again, off-again scuttling, interrupted several times by bankruptcies, unexpected environmental remediation delays, and the heightened storm years of 2004-2005. Altogether, as the PNJ's Larry Wheeler reported earlier this week, the total cost of sinking the ship has doubled from initial estimates, and now is expected to top $21 million.
Early on sinking day, the Navy and its civilian scrappers, Resolve Marine Group of Port Everglades, Fla., will detonate preset charges to punch the last crucial holes in the hull to allow the carrier to take on seawater at a strategic pace and pattern so that it sinks "even keel, even trim." The slow-motion belly flop is expected to last at least five hours.
Much of the Oriskany's long history with the Seventh Fleet, as well as its oft-delayed scuttling, can be read on the official site of the Oriskany Museum, maintained by the "Battle of Oriskany Historical Society" in the village of Oriskany, N.Y.
In September 1976, Oriskany headed to Bremerton, Washington, to be decommissioned. She was stricken from the Naval Vessel Registrar in 1989. In 1994 she was sold for scrapping, and in May 1996 was towed to Mare Island Navy Yard, Vallejo, California. After a prolonged effort, the contractor defaulted and Oriskany was repossessed by the Navy in 1997.Destin's Emerald Coast.com also has a concise summary, with links to more:
Oriskany was later transferred to the Beaumont Reserve Fleet, Beaumont Texas from Mare Island. It was determined that the journey would take the ship around Cape Horn, being towed by Crowley Marine Service. In August 1999, the Oriskany arrived in Beaumont, Texas where it was harbored in Port Neches River.
The 888-foot carrier has a rich 62-year history that began in the last years of World War II.Photographs of the carrier in her prime, as well as in her rusted dotage, can be viewed here courtesy of the U.S. Navy. The Navy's environmental assessment and remediation plans are here, in pdf format.
In 1943, Congress authorized the construction of the ship, named after the tide-turning Battle of Oriskany in the Revolutionary War. The ship was launched on Oct. 13, 1945.
On Sept. 25, 1950, the Oriskany was officially commissioned and sent to take part in the Korean Conflict. From 1952 to 1953, the Oriskany served with the U.S. Seventh Fleet as part of the United Nations Task Force. During this time, fighters took off from the Oriskany and took part in what is believed to be the first multi-jet aerial dog fight in history.
Movies such as, “The Bridges of Toko Ri,” were filmed upon the ‘Mighty O’ and President John F. Kennedy was a guest aboard her to watch an operation readineness demonstration.
The sinking of the Oriskany will be filmed by Prallax Films, Inc. of British Columbia, Canada. When the whole thing is over, the Navy claims the Oriskany will be the largest "intentionally sunken" artificial fishing reef in the world.
"As the carrier went down, its bow stuck up, straining the heavy metal anchor lines. The port side bow line appeared broken early in the process. Clouds of debris could be seen billowing from the hangar deck, and water churned and bubbled heavily at the submersion point. Towlines strained at the bow. "
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
"The mind-set was best explained by the linguist David W. Maurer in his classic 1940 book, 'The Big Con':
The amazing thing is how utterly stupid the "Christian psychotherapist" was -- and how astonishingly persistent the Nigerians were. If the ending of the article is any indication, by now they've found a way to contact the devout shrink in prison and he's busy raising more money to hand over to them."As the lust for large and easy profits is fanned into a hot flame, the mark puts all his scruples behind him. He closes out his bank account, liquidates his property, borrows from his friends, embezzles from his employer or his clients. In the mad frenzy of cheating someone else, he is unaware of the fact that he is the real victim, carefully selected and fatted for the kill. Thus arises the trite but none the less sage maxim: 'You can’t cheat an honest man.' ”
The problem with those who oppose flood insurance reform -- and for that matter, many of those who argue for it, as well -- is that everyone seems to be driven by a "me-first" mentality.If any good should come out of the unusually severe flooding in New England it's a broader public understanding of the importance of the National Flood Insurance Program and a stronger coalition favoring rational reform and improvement of FEMA.
But don't hold your breath. In yesterday's New York Times, reporters Christopher Drew and Joseph B. Treaster identified two major forces opposing reform and improvement of the National Flood Insurance Program:
"The drive to restructure the perennially underfinanced program has been blocked by real estate interests [and] lawmakers from areas that rarely flood who see their constituents as supporting those who are frequently flooded, particularly in the South."The real estate people, we're told, fear that updated, realistic flood zone maps will reduce the market and increase the expense of home ownership. The "regional rivalries" arise between politicians in the drier states and those in wetter ones. This is illustrated by a particularly egregious remark uttered by one Michigan congresswoman:
"You've got people living in dry areas paying for people who want to keep living in wet ones," said Representative Candice S. Miller, Republican of Michigan. "They're sticking it to us, and I don't like to be stuck."Oddly enough, congressman Miller is from a moderately populous district on the eastern shore of Saginaw Bay. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, substantial parts of what is now her district experienced devastating floods in 1904, 1947, 1975, and 1986.
Apparently, Miller doesn't know her district's history well enough to appreciate what that could mean in the years ahead. But you can be sure that when it happens you'll see her elbowing her way to the front of the trough.
The problem with those who oppose flood insurance reform -- and for that matter, many of those who argue for it, as well -- is that everyone seems to be driven by a "me-first" mentality. Few take account of the larger needs of the nation or, for that matter, the generations to come.
Even the assessment such people make of their own self-interest is measured with a broken yardstick that is often no longer than the next election cycle. Is it really true that updating flood zone maps would increase the expense of home ownership? No more than paying less for a gas guzzler makes owning a car cheaper. What an honest updating of NFIP flood maps would do is candidly express the real expense, and risks, of owning a home.
Indeed, as Drew and Treaster point out, the very kind of shortsightedness exhibited by Congresswoman Miller is what created the problems now afflicting the NFIP:
"Those same lobbying pressures and regional rivalries have helped create an insurance plan that has consistently defied the central rule of how to succeed in the insurance trade: have enough policyholders paying enough in premiums to spread out the risk and build a financial cushion against disaster."As former NFIP director J. Robert Hunter told the Times, shackles placed by Congress decades ago on the program made sure the NFIP --
"... hasn't come close to its promise of insuring everyone who's in danger of being flooded, reducing the cost of disasters for the federal government or making sure the program ultimately pays its own way.What? Congress is gazes through a distorted looking glass? Well, whoever do you suppose it is who keeps electing those idiots and sending them to Washington to do more damage?
"It's like a trip through the looking glass. Everything is backwards."
Saturday, May 13, 2006
Friday, May 12, 2006
"Now, for liberals who‘ve long been going against almost all of these issues to defend privacy, the news has to be disturbing. But no less so the conservatives who have fought national ID cards and gun registration for years out of fear of big government.On this subject, Scarborough knows what he's talking about, as the full MSNBC transcript reveals:
"Now, whatever you consider yourself, friends, you should be afraid. You should be very afraid. With over 200 million Americans targeted, this domestic spying program is so widespread, it is so random, it is so far removed from focusing on al Qaeda suspects that the president was talking about today, that it‘s hard to imagine any intelligence program in U.S. history being so susceptible to abuse."
"I served on the Judiciary Committee and the Armed Service Committee in Congress for four years, and no program I studied while using security clearances ever came close to the scope of this massive spy program. It is dangerous, it breaks FCC laws, and it endangers all Americans‘ right to privacy.Somehow, Joe seems to have overlooked the Republican congressional majority. No matter. There's plenty of blame to go around.
"But you know what? The villains in this spy program are pretty easy to target, almost as easy as your phone records. First you have the president, who‘s shown that he will break laws if they get in his way of spying. Second, Democratic leaders—they complain now, but where were they? They reviewed the program. Why no protest? Don‘t hold your press conferences now, Nancy Pelosi. Tell us about it when you learn about it!
"And finally, the phone companies, who actually profited from the government reading all of your phone bills. They should be sued and their CEOs fired.
"Hey, memo to the president and congressional leaders who signed up on this lousy program: We don‘t trust you anymore. We don‘t trust you with our phone bills. We don‘t trust you with our bank records. We don‘t trust you with our medical histories. From now on, if you want to look at Americans‘ private records, get a damn search warrant!"
Rather than looking for someone to blame, the pressing question ought to be, "Who will put a stop to this administration's drift away from constitutional democracy?"
"It's been said that negligent local government is Northwest Florida's most lucrative source of revenue."Navarre Beach residents just can't catch a break. First, they lose their leaseholder tax appeal. Now, they're up in arms over escalating Santa Rosa County MSBU assessments for public beach renourishment, according to William Rabb's report in today's PNJ:
"The county set up a taxing district for the beach renourishment work in 2003 and sent bills to beach residents last month. The renourishment fees were based largely on the 2005 appraised value of the property. But because of rising housing prices after recent hurricanes, those values have little basis in reality, property owners said."Rabb's article includes the obligatory individual tale of horror. It's compelling -- and probably representative of a good many other Navarre Beach residents and businesses:
"Adrienne Wilson and her husband purchased a condominium unit on Navarre Beach a decade ago so they could rent it out and build their retirement nest egg.What Rabb has missed is that Navarre Beach residents actually asked for the MSBU tax to be imposed on themselves. Worried some years ago that Santa Rosa County was dragging its feet addressing the issue of post-Hurricane Georges sand replacement, Navarre Beach residents went so far as to propose taxing themselves as a way of persuading the county to undertake the project.
"'Now, we're going to have to sell it because we can't pay the assessment fees,' said Wilson, a dental hygienist from Atlanta.
* * *
"Wilson, for example, must pay $13,000 over six years for her 14th-story unit at The Pearl condominium, while a similar unit on the second floor pays much less, she said. She can't rent her condo for much because the development's swimming pool is still out of service, but she still must pay more than owners in other high-rise developments on the beach, she said."
"'It's just not fair,'" Wilson said.
Even the Navarre Beach Leaseholders & Residents Assn. supported the move. The organization's leadership told others at the time it was a "good will" gesture.
The county apparently saw it as a sucker's move. First, Santa Rosa county created the new MSBU taxing authority, as requested, to make beach residents shoulder a substantial part of public beach renourishment expenses. Then, tax assessor Greg Brown went one better and imposed ad valorem taxes on all Navarre Beach leaseholds. Now, it seems, he's calculating the special MSBU assessment on the basis of artificially inflated property values.
So much for good will gestures. If beach renourishment is a good idea -- and as Cornelia Dean has documented there are plenty of reasons to think it may not be -- as long as the beaches remain public, paying for it should be a public responsibility, not a private burden.
It's been said that negligent local government is Northwest Florida's most lucrative source of revenue. Haven't planned for picking up hurricane debris? Let FEMA pay for it. Don't have enough storm shelters? Ask the state legislature for money. Idiotically located a smelly sewer plant in downtown Pensacola? Have the feds pay to move it. Avoided sensible zoning to keep dangerous dioxin plants away from residential neighborhoods? Let EPA pay the clean-up costs.
They don't call this the "Florida Panhandle" for nothing.
The next time a Northwest Florida city or county ducks its public responsibility in hopes someone else will pay for it, remember the "good will" gesture of Navarre Beach residents. More likely than not, all you'll get is a sucker-punch.
Thursday, May 11, 2006
In August 2004, Bush nominated Goss by saying, "He is the right man to lead this important agency at this critical moment in our nation's history."The credit for spotting this telling repetition, as many now know, actually belongs not to some courageous White House reporter who suddenly woke up, but to comedian Jon Stewart. Stewart's "Daily Show" news spoof on the Comedy Channel spotted Bush's deja vu moment three days ago, as Crooks and Liars documented.
Last week, he nominated Gen. Michael Hayden with these words: "He's the right man to lead the CIA at this critical moment in our history."
However that may be, the PNJ sees the Porter/Hayden nomination announcement as further evidence of the Bush administration's incompetence, "confusion and inertia" in managing the CIA. In truth, there are substantial grounds for concern that it masks an even deeper and more troubling feature to the administration's handling of the CIA agency.
As Sidney Blumenthal explains today in Salon.com [subscription or one-day free registration required] for five years Bush has been "looking for someone to rid him of the troublesome agency" ever since "CIA analysts...refused to put their stamp of approval on the administration's reasons for the Iraq war."
"Vice President Dick Cheney and his chief of staff, I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, personally came to Langley to intimidate analysts on several occasions. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his then deputy secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, constructed their own intelligence bureau, called the Office of Special Plans, to sidestep the CIA and shunt disinformation corroborating the administration's arguments directly to the White House.In other words, Mr. Bush appointed Porter Goss for political reasons, to purge the agency of analysts who would not gin up phony reasons justifying the administration's argument "that Saddam was cooperating with al Qaeda." In Goss and the retinue of Republican congressional aides he brought with him to the CIA, Bush thought "he had discovered the perfect man for the bloody job." He embedded a politician in the agency whose top priority was loyalty to George W. Bush, not the facts as revealed by professional intelligence workers.
"'The administration used intelligence not to inform decision-making, but to justify a decision already made,' Paul Pillar, then the chief Middle East analyst for the CIA, writes in the March-April issue of Foreign Affairs. 'The process did not involve intelligence work designed to find dangers not yet discovered or to inform decisions not yet made. Instead, it involved research to find evidence in support of a specific line of argument -- that Saddam was cooperating with al Qaeda -- which in turn was being used to justify a specific policy decision.'
Goss failed only because of Hookergate. His --
"attempt to run the CIA through his own band of loyalists proved his ultimate undoing. It turned out that the 'gosslings,' as they were known at Langley (after 'quislings'), had unsavory connections that trailed them into the agency. An unintended consequence of Goss' dependence on his team of political hatchet men was that his future was dependent on their past."And that is the really worrisome aspect to Bush's deja vu moment. It's not a question of "confusion" or "inertia." Bush is changing CIA directors, not his long-standing goal of politicizing the agency. Why shouldn't he recycle the same CIA director announcement? Nothing has changed but the name of the nominee.
As Blumenthal says, Hayden is just another "loyalist to the administration" who has used "his uniform as a shield against the heat generated by the revelation of illegal domestic surveillance by the NSA."
"Regardless of anodyne assurances offered in his forthcoming congressional testimony, Hayden will preside over the liquidation of the CIA as it has been known. The George H.W. Bush CIA headquarters building in Langley will of course remain standing. But the agency will be chipped apart, some of its key parts absorbed by other agencies, with the Pentagon emerging as the ultimate winner.Concludes Blumenthal, "No president has ever before ruined an agency at the heart of national security out of pique and vengeance. The manipulation of intelligence by political leadership demands ever tightened control. But political purges provide only temporary relief from the widening crisis of policy failure."
"The militarization of intelligence under Bush is likely to guarantee military solutions above other options. Uniformed officers trained to identity military threats and trends will take over economic and political intelligence for which they are untrained and often incapable, and their priorities will skew analysis. But the bias toward the military option will be one that the military in the end will dislike. It will find itself increasingly bearing the brunt of foreign policy and stretched beyond endurance. The vicious cycle leads to a downward spiral. And Hayden's story will be like a dull shadow of Powell's -- a tale of a 'good soldier' who salutes, gets promoted, is used and abused, and is finally discarded."
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Halliburton Co., ever interested in the public good, yesterday chose the "Lexis-Nexis Catastrophic Loss Conference" at the Ritz-Carlton on Amelia Island, Fla., to announce an advanced technology that will "keep corporate managers safe even when climate change makes life as we know it impossible." It's called SurvivaBalls.
Fred S. Wolf, a Halliburton representative, was the featured speaker yesterday on a panel presentation devoted to "Disaster Preparedness: How To Plan and React to a Catastrophic Event." As he explained in prepared remarks:
"The SurvivaBall is designed to protect the corporate manager no matter what Mother Nature throws his or her way. This technology is the only rational response to abrupt climate change."In an accompanying media release, Halliburton explains:
"The devices -- looking like huge inflatable orbs -- will include sophisticated communications systems, nutrient gathering capacities, onboard medical facilities, and a daunting defense infrastructure to ensure that the corporate mission will not go unfulfilled even when most human life is rendered impossible by catastrophes or the consequent epidemics and armed conflicts.The full text of Brown's remarks is available here.
"'It's essentially a gated community for one,'" said Wolf.
Will Halliburton's ingenuity really come to the rescue of corporations whose very profits, not to mention the lives of executives and managers, are threatened as the world heats up, glaciers melt, and ever-stronger hurricanes reduce American coastal cities to rubble?
Yes, men. Bet on it.
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
It's like a medical alert. The PNJ doesn't want subscribers, having forgotten all about the litigation, opening up their newspaper one morning and having a heart attack over some big black headline announcing a tax decision.
The legal fight about whether millions of dollars in property taxes should be paid on Pensacola Beach homes, condominiums and businesses continues unabated by the Navarre Beach leaseholders' recent court loss.In over 450 words, Pivnick manages to avoid reporting one new fact about the lawsuits. But he does grab a telling quote from the attorney representing some of the litigating leaseholders:
Six lawsuits are pending in Escambia County, and it could be only a matter of weeks before the first one gets a trial date... .
"The leases at Portofino do not have that 99-year perpetual renewal language," said Ed Fleming, a lawyer for Portofino's homeowners associations.That's not exactly a Robert Luskin press leak. What Fleming is saying is well known, too. As we've said before, not all leases Pensacola Beach leases are the same. It stands to reason not all leaseholder tax suit arguments will be the same, either.
Some residential and commercial leases on Pensacola Beach are for a period of 99 years with an automatic right of renewal for an additional 99 years on "like" terms. Others - like the Portofino leases -- are for 99 years with a right to renew, but the terms are left open to negotiation. That leaves nothing but a generalized obligation of "good faith" in coming to terms over any renewal.
A few leases we've seen have garbled renewal language specifying only a right to renew without more and in key sentences seem to be missing a few subjects and verbs. Among residential as well as commercial leases, there are some for a shorter duration and others that flatly terminate after a set term of years, usually less than 50.
If all of this illustrates anything, it's that when the Island Authority wrote individual leases it was perfectly capable of specifying terms that did, or did not, convey the kind of "equitable ownership" that was decisive in last year's Navarre Beach tax ruling. That the SRIA did not always do so seemingly supports Fleming's argument.
The real lesson is for anyone contemplating a purchase on Pensacola Beach: read the lease before you buy. Every word of it.
For more about the beach leaseholders' tax lawsuits, check the Pensacola Beach Tax Suit web site.
Nov. 10, 2004
Beach Leaseholders' Lawsuit Filed
Dec. 21, 2004
Beach Tax Update
Feb. 12, 2005
Navarre Beach Tax Ruling
June 18, 2005
For Sale: Beach Evidence!
January 27, 2006
Beach Tax Settlement In The Wind?
Feb. 6, 2006
Feb. 19, 2006
Mar. 3, 2006
March 12, 2006
Monday, May 08, 2006
"They're working on the levees but the city is flat broke and may declare bankruptcy. Pot holes don't get fixed, stop lights still don't work in areas, the streets are still full of debris in many areas."Tom Morgan, a French Quarter resident and local jazz radio personality took refuge in the Pensacola area after Hurricane Katrina. We published his earlier letter back in March. Here is the latest:-- Tom Morgan
A few people have emailed me and asked how things are going and whether I will send out another update of my log. I finally have time after three weeks of festivals here in New Orleans.
Every day during the last two weeks when I went to the Jazz & Heritage Festival, I drove through areas that had four to five feet of water. All I see in those areas now are semi-gutted houses and a trailer or two. To say that this area in the middle of the city is coming back would be a whopper of a lie, at the least. Everywhere I look it is the same. There's still massive destruction and very little recovery.
Sure we can hold festivals. The electricity is there and the water is good, but are people really coming back? Not yet.
How has life changed in the last few months? We've had more visitors but not enough. I expect that many businesses in the French Quarter will close by the end of the summer. Business is that bad. Even last week when normally people stay over between the first and second weekends of JazzFest, the Quarter still was not even half as busy as it would normally have been Pre-K. The restaurants will make it but the small shops and the ones with the highest rents are hurting badly.
Our electricity in the Marigny is still wonky. We have been able to get through a rain storm or two without an outage but then it went out for an hour last Saturday for no apparent reason.
Some of the street lights have been replaced but we still have some very funky stop lights and none of the blown-down signs have been reinstalled. Relatively few businesses in the 'hood have reopened. My mechanic still hasn't shown up nor have they done any work on the local supermarket.
We've had two neighbors move out. One young couple was never really ready for life in the Big Easy. They moved back to Seattle. Other neighbors have moved due to job changes that Katrina forced on them. This is not a isolated incident, more friends will be moving away due to what has happened.
It has gotten more expensive to live in New Orleans as everything including the taxes on our house have gone up. The music is as sweet as ever which definitely keeps us all sane. Personally, other than the highs of the festivals -- where I hosted many broadcasts, MC'd "Piano Night" at the House of Blues, and did an interview with singer John Boutte on the Allison Miner stage at the 'fest -- stuff is still not going right. I have not received an electric and gas bill for 7 months. I have emailed and called numerous times and still no bill. I totally expect them to turn off my power when I am away for not paying a bill they won't send me.
My insurance company has still not sent me our settlement despite it being settled 6 months ago. My private adjuster can't even get anyone on the phone.
Am I frustrated? Wouldn't you be?
[My wife] Hild's job is seemingly coming back this summer as the Tulane medical school reestablishes itself in the city. Dottie the cat loves the warm weather and would like to be outside all of the time except when it rains. We had a wonderful party last Wednesday with a 100 lbs of crawfish boiled on premises and a wonderful band. A good time was had by all, although the party cost 50% more than last year's of similar size.
I still have not received any magazines since the storm and just Saturday got a letter with a Jan 3 post date. Talk about late delivery! I have no trust in any government entity anymore.
Oh, yes. And where have all those billions of dollars earmarked for us gone? Hell if I know. They're working on the levees but the city is flat broke and may declare bankruptcy. Pot holes don't get fixed, stop lights still don't work in areas, the streets are still full of debris in many areas. Yep, and hurricane season starts in less than three weeks. They tell us they are going to evacuate if a Cat 3 even shows up in Gulf. How will anything get better if half the city leaves three times a month for the next four months?
Still no doctor and no dentist, so much so that we are thinking about flying to Virgina just to have our teeth checked by our old dentist and getting Hild a mammogram. Are we frustrated and tired of the way our city is going? Wouldn't you be?
Hild and I don't want to move away. We both have no desire to be anywhere else in the US. This is good and bad as we are trapped in a situation that is not going to get better for years, so we must be happy with what we have -- good friends, a wonderful house and amazing music. Next time I write, let's hope I will be less frustrated and more optimistic.-- Tom Morgan
"This has a lot of good stuff, a lot of bad stuff and a lot of 'I don't know stuff," one ... lobbyist says of the package."
The Florida legislative session ended late last week with passage of a 141-page insurance bill that slaps a few band-aids on what at least one legislator calls a cancerous tumor. Paige St. John, writing for the Florida flagship of Gannett Corp., offers an overview:
"The Legislature ended 60 days of session near midnight Friday agreeing to pick up $715 million of a $1.7 billion deficit brewing at Citizens Property Insurance, while requiring steep rate hikes from the state-run pool and partly lifting rate controls on other insurers.For a more detailed -- although admittedly preliminary -- analysis, you should wade through the Insurance Journal article. In a second editorial posted mid-day Monday, IJ also summarizes what it sees as the bill's highlights:
* * *
"What we're doing here is just damage control right now," said Rep. Stan Mayfield, voicing a common sentiment among frustrated legislators. "We're just stopping the bleeding," the Vero Beach Republican said. "Then we have to cure the cancer."
* * *
The bill contains $250 million in loans to private insurance companies willing to expand in Florida and consumer-backed catastrophe coverage for the small companies that make up a third of the market.
Both are considered emergency measures.
* * *
Citizens Property Insurance estimates it would take a 60 percent increase, on top of the 45 percent rate hike it already seeks on those homes, to meet a proposed mandate to set its coastal rates high enough to cover the cost of a 100-year storm.
"It is tough," said Sen. J.D. Alexander, a lead insurance negotiator, but "it essentially represents the subsidies that have been in place for these coastal homes, for years and year and years. * * *
Repeatedly, lawmakers were told they have no choice but to open the door to dramatic rate increases."We're in a hurricane cycle for the next 10 to 20 years. It's not going to get any better," said Senate Banking and Insurance Chairman Rudy Garcia, R-Hialeah.
"The bill provides $715 million in tax dollars to help cover part of Citizens' deficit of $1.7 billion, increased rates for Citizen's policyholders, lower emergency assessments by spreading them out over 10 years, and the elimination of homes valued at over $1 million from Citizens after 2008.If there are any winners, they would be insurance customers with a primary residence in Florida, "not vacation and seasonal homes."
Other provisions in the bill will include grants for homeowner disaster mitigation, the implementation of a flex-rating system that will allow insurers to adjust rates 5 percent statewide and 10 percent within specific region, and a provision that allows limited apportionment companies to purchase reinsurance from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. There is also a rapid cash buildup of 25 percent for the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund. Along with the positive developments some adverse provisions passed including one that will require insurers to adjust Citizens' hurricane claims beginning July 1, 2007."
Losers include "owners of $1 million-plus dwellings" who will no longer be insured by the state-owned Citizens Property Insurance. They'll have to turn to the "voluntary market" (if there is one) or "surplus lines market at unsubsidized rates."
Saturday, May 06, 2006
Over the past few weeks we've accumuated a bunch of miscellaneous stuff we thought might be useful some day, and then threw it in a corner. But it's done nothing there except gather dust.
Gotta get rid of it, but it won't sell on Ebay. So here it is. Pick through it. Take what what you want. It's all free, but there's no guarantee the links will work:
"The oldest victim to date? Ninety-five. The youngest? A 6-year old boy. The most recent? Fifty-six year old [wheel-chair bound] Emily Marie Delafield of Green Cove Springs, Florida died on April 24 when police, who were called to settle a family spat, used a stun gun to subdue her."
- Pensacola Beach Elementary Scores 100%
"100 percent of the third-graders [at PBES] tested in math and reading met proficiency levels for the second year in a row.
* * *
'I am pleased,' Principal Jeff Castleberry said. 'I don't want the public to not feel like that's good, but we personally know we can get better and we will get better.' "
- The Pensacola News Journal editorializes that FCAT exams may have little to do with sound education but we should celebrate our children's success at them, anyway.
- "One Chicago Guy Pointing His Car South" to volunteer with Habitat for Humanity started a blog in April he calls "Lo and Behold." There, he posted photos of the recently-concluded weekend New Orleans Jazz Festival. Included is one of an airplane someone rented to fly overhead towing an "Impeach Bush" banner. Chicago Guy says, "It received a standing ovation from the people in the seats... ."
- CT Blogger has photographic evidence (as if any were needed) of Congressional hypocrisy: House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) arrives in a hybrid car at a press conference staged at a gas station. He yammers on about how the Republican majority is going to do something about high gas prices. Then, he leaves in the hybrid but just to go around the corner. Then he surreptiously switches cars -- and climbs into his own gas-guzzling S.U.V.
- Stuff Happens is playing in the round at Washington D.C.'s Joseph Papp Theater. The play, which has been revised to paint Colin Powell as a tragic figure, is drawing good reviews:
The overarching thrust of "Stuff Happens" is a portrait of an administration -- led by a Bush wilier than most of his critics give him credit for -- that swaggers into a war while seemingly incapable of contemplating the consequences. Although that thesis will not strike every theatergoer as revolutionary, it's the mixing of personalities -- and the ways in which the work portrays the high-stakes psychological gamesmanship among the politicians, statesmen and strategists -- that gives it its most surprising moments.
- For those who were wondering if Donald Rumsfeld plans on vacationing in Europe after leaving office, here is a straight-forward summary of The Nuremberg Principles, for which "the Greatest Generation" fought so valiantly in World War II:
Principle I. Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.
Principle II. The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III. The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
Principle IV. The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
Principle V. Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
Principle VI. The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes Against Peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War Crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave-labour or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes Against Humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Principle VII . Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
- Florida Leads Nation in Taser Deaths
"The oldest victim to date? Ninety-five. The youngest? A 6-year old boy. The most recent? Fifty-six year old [wheel-chair bound] Emily Marie Delafield of Green Cove Springs, Florida died on April 24 when police, who were called to settle a family spat, used a stun gun to subdue her."
- Arthur Schlesinger Jr. recently penned an opt-ed worth reading:
"The issue of preventive war as a presidential prerogative is hardly new. In February 1848 Rep. Abraham Lincoln explained his opposition to the Mexican War:
'Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose -- and you allow him to make war at pleasure [emphasis added]. . . . If, today, he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him, 'I see no probability of the British invading us'; but he will say to you, 'Be silent; I see it, if you don't.'This is precisely how George W. Bush sees his presidential prerogative: Be silent; I see it, if you don't.
* * *
There stretch ahead for Bush a thousand days of his own. He might use them to start the third Bush war: the Afghan war (justified), the Iraq war (based on fantasy, deception and self-deception), the Iran war (also fantasy, deception and self-deception). There is no more dangerous thing for a democracy than a foreign policy based on presidential preventive war."